1.與(yu)氣力輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)的比較：氣力輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)機輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)速(su)度高，容易(yi)物(wu)(wu)(wu)(wu)料(liao)破碎；會(hui)造成管(guan)道堵塞，尤其是輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)潮濕性物(wu)(wu)(wu)(wu)料(liao)時；物(wu)(wu)(wu)(wu)料(liao)與(yu)管(guan)壁撞擊，摩(mo)(mo)擦較大，有引起火花的安*隱(yin)患。而片(pian)堿管(guan)鏈粉體輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)機輸(shu)(shu)(shu)送(song)速(su)度較低，物(wu)(wu)(wu)(wu)料(liao)顆粒不(bu)易(yi)破損，管(guan)道不(bu)容易(yi)堵塞；物(wu)(wu)(wu)(wu)料(liao)與(yu)管(guan)壁的摩(mo)(mo)擦小，不(bu)會(hui)引起火花，能量消耗低。

2.與斗提(ti)輸送機的(de)比(bi)較(jiao)：金(jin)屬摩擦有(you)引起(qi)(qi)火(huo)花的(de)安*隱患；需(xu)(xu)要(yao)張緊裝置；能量消(xiao)耗較(jiao)高；需(xu)(xu)要(yao)較(jiao)深的(de)地(di)坑，占(zhan)用(yong)的(de)空間大；而片堿管鏈粉(fen)體(ti)輸送機沒有(you)引起(qi)(qi)火(huo)花的(de)安*隱患，；能量消(xiao)耗較(jiao)低(di)，沒有(you)死區；不(bu)需(xu)(xu)要(yao)地(di)坑，占(zhan)用(yong)空間較(jiao)小。

3.皮帶輸(shu)送機的比(bi)較：只能(neng)二維布(bu)置(zhi)，僅有(you)(you)一個(ge)(ge)出(chu)料(liao)口(kou)；容易(yi)產生粉塵和靜電，維修頻(pin)率高。而(er)片堿管鏈(lian)粉體(ti)輸(shu)送機能(neng)三維布(bu)置(zhi)，可以有(you)(you)多個(ge)(ge)出(chu)料(liao)口(kou)；能(neng)同時向兩個(ge)(ge)方向輸(shu)送，有(you)(you)防爆設計(ji)要求，成本低。

4.于螺(luo)(luo)旋(xuan)輸(shu)送(song)(song)機的比較：輸(shu)送(song)(song)粘性物料，容(rong)易(yi)造(zao)成(cheng)設(she)備抱(bao)死：容(rong)易(yi)損(sun)壞顆(ke)粒(li)物料；功率(lv)消耗(hao)大(da)，輸(shu)送(song)(song)距離短。而片(pian)堿(jian)管鏈(lian)粉體輸(shu)送(song)(song)機可以轉(zhuan)向輸(shu)送(song)(song)；在輸(shu)送(song)(song)粉料時，結(jie)合出料裝置設(she)計，能有效出料；輸(shu)送(song)(song)距離長于螺(luo)(luo)旋(xuan)輸(shu)送(song)(song)機數倍。